[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-707?page=comments#action_12356281 
] 

Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi commented on TAPESTRY-707:
----------------------------------------------------

This is a great idea which promotes orthogonality. I'd vote for this, but it's 
closed.
A major area of concern is that External Service is unusable (using parameter 
order to assign values it's a recipe for disaster), and Page Service doesn't 
allow for params to be set on the URL line. I'd contribute a PageService with 
named parameters, if only improvements where taken into account here.


> Page Parameters
> ---------------
>
>          Key: TAPESTRY-707
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-707
>      Project: Tapestry
>         Type: Wish
>   Components: Framework
>     Versions: 4.0
>     Reporter: Claus Nielsen
>     Assignee: Howard M. Lewis Ship
>     Priority: Minor

>
> I am ew to Tapestry, but as I understand it, a common method of activating a 
> page is:
> - Get the page (using @InjectPage or other methods)
> - Passing data to it using it's setters
> - Activating it.
> Exactly which setters must be used is not always obvious. Therefore it would 
> be nice if it was possible to annotate the setters / fields a caller is 
> expected to use to pass in parameters to the page.
> Then Tapestry could also check that all required parameters has been set 
> before the page is activated.
> Taking this a bit further, Tapestry could even take take of calling the 
> setters, if the injected page-getter (RequestCycle.activate()) accepted an 
> object-array with all the parameters to use.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to