That's the theory anyway ... On 11/13/05, Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Then let's get someone to help in this respect. Not everything has to be > done by Howard. > > -- > Ing. Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi > Director Técnico > DTQ Software > > Massimo Lusetti wrote: > > On 11/13/05, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> BTW from Eclipse 2.1 to 3.0 the list of breaking changes had 38 items. > >> However, there were a massive set of changes which one would expect > >> moving a project from 2.X to 3.0. > >> > > > > By the way I'm all with you and others when talking this way, but as i > > can see Tapestry is mostly developed by one person (completely > > different from Eclipse) and that's makes all this kind of stuff > > difficult to embrace. > > I know the community will gain a lot by this attitude and i repeat, > > I'm all by your side but i also understand Howard side, i mean if > > someone would ask for a vote I'll give mine to the "roadmap". > > > > Despite this i firmly believe in Tapestry and it's future as right now > > it's the base of the ui in core business apps I'm starting to > > prototype right now. > > > > > > -- > > Massimo > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- Howard M. Lewis Ship Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator, Jakarta Tapestry Creator, Jakarta HiveMind Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support and project work. http://howardlewisship.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
