Hi, Then I am not the right person.I thought I know the solution of it. Thanks, Anil Udasi.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > thanks for reply. Maybe I was not exact. I know, how > to solve problem, but > I think this behaviour is little bit strange (and > maybe dangerous), and I > would like to discuss it. At least it is not much > well documented. > > Suggest bigger project with many developers. When > someone adds by misteke > property definition to existing getter and setter, > he will not recognize > it anyway - only ifhe discover the application is > working differently. > > Petr > > > > > anil udasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 05.12.2005 16:19 > Please respond to > "Tapestry development" > <[email protected]> > > > To > Tapestry development > <[email protected]> > cc > > Subject > Re: Defining page property using implemented methods > in Tapestry 4 > > > > > > > Hi, if you dont want Tapestry to implement the > 'implementedWithDefinition' please remove its > declaration from property file with your code > intact, > It will fix this problem. > > Thanks, > Anil Udasi. > > > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > when I declare page property using <property > > name="testName"> in page > > property file and then implements getters and > > setters for this property > > using concrette (not abstract) methods > > implementation in page class , > > Tapestry ignores this getters and setters and > > constructs this own methods > > implementation as the getters and setters were > > defined using abstract > > methods. > > > > Result is the implemented logic in methods is > > quitely overriden and > > ignored. > > > > Maybe I am wrong in implementation or misread > docs, > > but the reading I did > > found for this problem is not much helpful, too. > On > > > > > ../tapestry-4.0-beta-13-docs/UsersGuide/spec.html#spec.property > > " ... In Tapestry 4.0, the type of the implemented > > property will simply > > match the type of any existing (abstract) > property, > > or will default to > > Object. ..." > > > > This does not expalin too much clearly what will > > happen. Or the abstract > > method shoud be required for property or the > > concrette implementation > > should not be overriden for the property. > > > > I am using: > > > > Tapestry beta 13 > > Hiveming 1.1 > > Apache Tomcat 4.1 > > Java SDK1.4.2_08 > > > > Attached please find working example. Problem is > in > > property > > "implementedWithDefinition". It has getters and > > setters implemented with > > log.debug message, which is never called - althoug > > it should be - can be > > seen in the log example o the end of email. > > > > Can you tell me ouur opinion about this problem? > > > > Best regards > > > > Petr Marek > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > EXAMPLE: > > > > TestProperties.html > > ------------------------ > > <html> > > <body> > > Hello, this is test of properties! > > </body> > > </html> > > > > TestProperties.page > > ------------------------- > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > > <!DOCTYPE page-specification PUBLIC > > "-//Apache Software Foundation//Tapestry > > Specification 4.0//EN" > > > > > "http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/dtd/Tapestry_4_0.dtd";> > > > > <page-specification > > > class="cz.profinit.kos.web.stranky.TestProperties"> > > <property name="abstractWithDefinition"/> > > <property name="implementedWithDefinition"/> > > </page-specification> > > > > TestProperties.java > > ------------------------ > > > > package cz.profinit.kos.web.stranky; > > > > import org.apache.log4j.Logger; > > import > > org.apache.tapestry.event.PageBeginRenderListener; > > import org.apache.tapestry.event.PageEvent; > > import org.apache.tapestry.html.BasePage; > > > > /** > > * Tests the results of calling and setting > abstract > > and implemented > > properties. > > * > > * History: > > * <br>$Log: TestProperties.java,v $ > > * <br> > > * > > * @author $Author: pmarek $ > > * @version $Revision: 1.0 $ > > */ > > > > public abstract class TestProperties extends > > BasePage implements > > PageBeginRenderListener { > > > > private static Logger log = > > Logger.getLogger(TestProperties.class.getName()); > > > > /** > > * Abstract property with definition in > > TestProperties.page using > > <property tag>. > > * @return > > */ > > public abstract String > > getAbstractWithDefinition(); > > public abstract void > > setAbstractWithDefinition(String > > abstractWithDefinition); > > > > /** > > * Implemented property with definition in > > TestProperties.page > > using <property tag>. > > */ > > private String implementedWithDefinition; > > public String > getImplementedWithDefinition() > > { > > log.debug("running > > getImplementedWithDefinition()..."); > > return > === message truncated === __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
