On Dec 11, 2005, at 2:00 PM, Jeff Lubetkin wrote:
The lack of decent documentation of the new (and very cool)
validation system in either the TextField component doc or user
guide makes Tapestry look unprofessional and incomplete. Rather
than having docs to point my developers to, I have to hold a little
validation class every time someone wants to use it. I've been
able to excuse this by saying "well, it's just beta, I'm sure
they'll document it before the final release".
While I agree that the code is ready, I'm registering a (non-
binding, of course) protest vote against calling T4 "final" until
this documentation issue is fixed.
Jeff - this is a classic, and often annoying, response....
How about rather than holding an internal validation class, you
write up the details as patches to Tapestry's documentation and
submit them? Then next time your developers need documentation, you
can say RTM that you helped write. :)
Erik
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
