I did actually double check yesterday and it appears that 0.5.0 ~is~ in cvs
now .

I don't know what that means for these other utilities yet though, as my
non-impartial view still thinks they may have other advantages. A re-read of
source/examples is probably in order to determine how comparable they are.

On 12/29/05, Hugo Palma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I agree that that would be ideal, but that project doesn't even have CVS
> configured, and it doesn't look like Jean is going to put his code in
> CVS in the near future judging by some quotes i've seen from him. So i
> guess i'm not sure where that leaves us, i too have some code that i'd
> like to donate to the comunity but like you found no place to put it.
> The way i see it either a new real open source project is created for
> this and then we ask Jean for permission to add  his code to this new
> project risking a no or we try and convince Jean to finally create the
> CVS repository.
>
>
> Raul Raja Martinez wrote:
> > If they are not all tapestry related I would talk to Jean-Francois
> > Poilpret [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > at http://hivetranse.sourceforge.net/, The Hiveutils project is a set
> > of utilities for hivemind.
> >
> > Best regards.
> >
> > Raul.
> >
> > Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> >> If someone was going to contribute a set of useful hivemind classes,
> >> like
> >> hibernate/security/jms support, where would the best place be to put
> >> them? A
> >> new project hosted
> somewhere(javaforge?)/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/sourceforge?
> >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to