My concern is very simple, I take my current project as example:
There are portions where Ajax is so important I will infact restrict
those portions to browsers supported by the ajax implementation we will use.
Then again, there are portions of the application - say, login page,
where all I want is deliver good functionality to all users on all
browsers and *fast*, without having to give away very basic things that
are presently there like the nice focus feature of the form component.
Now do I need dojo for that very basic functionality? - and I am not
talking even about the Date component - just the very basics.
What is the cost of using dojo? for me right now it seems simply too
heavy on the browser -
I don't think we are in a position to make tapestry the bleading edge
framework for web 2.0 only - and say, well, out applications do have
some (performance) problems when you surf them on a PII win98 machine.
now about tacos->tapestry, I think we see it alike.
for me, I am convinced that the existance of tacos (and some other
libraries which *will* come soon ;-) ) is an oxygen for the evolvement
of tapestry - decentralisation, letting the community evolve and live
its own life and make that interact etc.
Cheers and again, good morning...
Ron
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
