I've been thinking about the page/component xml files some more. If they're out for T5 they are out. end of email.
If they were to stay in this form only: On 2/26/06, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip!> > > There is only one case: keeping cruft out of the templates. > <snip!> > I say keep the xml, but collapse it so that only <component> and > <meta> tags are allowed. (BTW <meta> should be dropped too, replaced by annotations) Then the xml falls out of any primary role in instantiating a page and only comes into play during the later stages of the PageLoader's work. That is, the part that builds the component tree. I say link this stripped down xml to the template (somehow) since (in my world) it no longer plays a role in instantiating the page - it's just used to build the component tree. It's now just a facet of the template. Geoff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
