It does seem like 3.x will be around for a little while longer..I was going to suggest doing something else to make sure we have enough support focused there but I still need to do a little homework first.
On 3/11/06, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > bumping 'cuz this was getting lost in the hard work Brain and Jesse are up > to! > > No time to comment right now though. > > Geoff > > On 3/10/06, Mark Stang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We have held off of 4.x because it was changing radically. Then the > updgrade seemed ok, but we were waiting on Spindle. Then along comes the > discussion of 5.0 which makes all of my converted code to 4.x a throw > away. However, we were still planning on going to 4.x but now it looks as > if by the time Geoff gets done with Spindle for 4.x it will be time to > move on to 5.0. > > > > So as far as I am concerned 3.x FOREVER, LONG LIVE 3.x. > > > > regards, > > > > Mark > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Brian K. Wallace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thu 3/9/2006 7:25 PM > > To: Tapestry development > > Subject: Re: Issues written against 3.0 > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > lol - pops out of a box somewhere... okay - that response was worth it > > for that part alone. > > > > Mind if I post to users asking version mindset? I'm still seeing 3.X > > questions being raised - if there's a substantial number, I'll work on > > keeping track of fixes for that so you can bulldoze ahead with the fun > > stuff. > > > > Jesse Kuhnert wrote: > > > Not by me. Unless someone makes a lot of noise about them at least. > > > > > > If people are still on 3.X and care enough about an issue then I hope > they > > > will speak up. I'm trying to not "blindly" close any old issues, but > ones I > > > know are definitely fixed in 4.0 > already and aren't worth anyone's > time > > > spending too many brain cycles on for 3.x. > > > > > > That's how I feel at least :) Unless a tapestry 3 developer pops out > of a > > > secret box somewhere I doubt it will be getting a lot of heavy bugfix > > > development... > > > > > > jesse > > > On 3/9/06, Brian K. Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Jesse - > > > > > > I know you're a non-3.X'er, but for the issues written against 3.0and > > > fixed in 4.1 - are the fixes getting back ported where they can? > > > > > > Brian > > >> > > - --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >> > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) > > > > iD8DBQFEEON+aCoPKRow/gARAuteAJ9xExOTULK5/YLpL7MEYUfsNS0KiACeM4V4 > > 6ob3fdKvwMstrt/ocw9TSLU= > > =KPPt > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > -- > The Spindle guy. http://spindle.sf.net > Get help with Spindle: > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/spindle-user > Blog: http://jroller.com/page/glongman > Feature Updates: http://spindle.sf.net/updates > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
