-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi wrote: > LOL, that's why it is a +0 and not-binding (well the not-binding is > really because I'm not a committer, but anyway!) > > But really, as a general principle is good to actually put the pressure > on the mundane things. Since nobody pays us salaries for doing open > source, of course, other "incentives" must be created. > And in any case, Jesse, you're the "code-lead for 4.1" right now. I > guess there should be some committer in charge of the 4.0 release? He > would get the pressure ;). >
Eh. Already seem like I'm under 14.7lbs/sq in of pressure - what's a little documentation on top of that? ;-) As much as I hate writing it, I hate not having docs more - so I'll at least be working on it. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) iD8DBQFEKZ1yaCoPKRow/gARAiTBAJ9+heT95dTcIyQyOFZ2c7gcvPv2aQCfQPF7 4v1k1Cgw5WGK0uoB2FcfikM= =kB+p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
