P.S. I've been slowly but surely trying to fix up any and all checkstyle
errors/warnings found over the past few weeks. (I think close to a couple
thousand have been cleared out now). Tweaks to this shared configuration
would also help keep me in line.

On 4/9/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yeah, sorry. Think I'm the guilty party again on this one :) Initially I
> was very frustrated with this coding style while doing tacos work, but have
> now found that it has saved me a lot of pain when trying to change the
> render cycle.
>
> I've traditionally preferred protected members by default, unless I knew
> that there just wasn't any possible reason why someone should have access to
> it or that anyone messing with it would screw things up.
>
> I should probably go read up on that article that Geoff pointed out (
> http://www.eclipse.org/eclipse/development/java-api-evolution.html) as my
> experience developing API's that affect thousands vs tens of developers is
> pretty much non existant.
>
>
> On 4/9/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We probably need to discuss coding style issues.
> >
> > For instance, a lot of the new code I'm looking at is using protected
> > instance variables.  I favor private instance variables in almost all
> > cases, even when I'm designing a class to be extended ... but then I
> > provide protected or public accessor methods to those private fields.
> >
> > What I haven't done in Tapestry or HiveMind, but am starting to do in
> > Tapestry5, is to use "final" much more liberally. But that's another
> > discussion.
> >
> > In addition, a note about HiveMind services and Log.
> >
> > If you have a writable property named "log" (i.e. setLog() is the
> > setter method name), and the type is org.apache.commons.logging.Log ,
> > then HiveMind will autowire that property to a Log instance based on
> > the *service* name (not the implementation class name). This is
> > actually a function of the default service factory,
> > hivemind.BuilderFactory .
> >
> > This is good for testing, since its easier to provide a mock
> > implementation of Log than to deal with the Log created by the class
> > for itself (the traditional approach).
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Howard M. Lewis Ship
> > Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
> > Creator, Jakarta Tapestry
> > Creator, Jakarta HiveMind
> >
> > Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
> > and project work.   http://howardlewisship.com
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jesse Kuhnert
> Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer
>
> Open source based consulting work centered around
> dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.  http://opennotion.com
>



--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer

Open source based consulting work centered around
dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.  http://opennotion.com

Reply via email to