I'm not in favour of any Hibernate specific solution. What about Cayenne? TopLink?
Hibernate is the flavour de jour. This may sound nuts but someday Hibernate will be eclipsed (as will Tapestry but I won't got there!). Squeezers are customizable enough to support any number of necessities, persistent objects just being one. Geoff On 4/14/06, Henri Dupre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/13/06, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 4/12/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > snip! > > > > > We might lose out on the DataSqueezer functionality in the process. Of > > > course, DS is most useful when you are trying to squeeze a > > > Serializable object as a parameter. For ints, strings, booleans, etc., > > > it is pretty straightforward to convert back and forth between > > > primitive values and string representations. > > > > Whoa there cowboy. We are having great success squeezing Hibernate > > objects down to a classname + uniqueId (and sets of such and lists of > > such, and even maps of such) today. > > > > Same here (although it is causing some headaches with objects getting loaded > twice)! We would really need a replacement to implement a similar > functionality for squeezing hibernate objects in and out. > > Henri. > > -- The Spindle guy. http://spindle.sf.net Blog: http://jroller.com/page/glongman Other interests: http://www.squidoo.com/spaceelevator/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
