Personally I think it is absolutely fantastic.
I seem to remember that you also mentioned something about being able to do JUnit tests by simulating requests -- did I just imagine it or are you really working on something like that?
That would really allow testing things that are normally "untestable".
Best regards,
-mb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any thoughts on the new code coverage reports?
It's a lot of work to get good code coverage from within
JUnit.
I wired up my environment to collect code coverage from
running the Tutorial and was easily able to push the
overall number to 66%.
In the long run, I expect to have the best code coverage
figures for any open-source project out there.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tapestry.sf.net
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: DEDICATED SERVERS only $89!
Linux or FreeBSD, FREE setup, FAST network. Get your own server
today at http://www.ServePath.com/indexfm.htm
_______________________________________________
Tapestry-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-developer
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
