I whole heartedly concur about OGNL.  I have yet to discover it's full power
(been too busy finishing projects).  But what I have seen / used, I like a
lot.  I always felt that the simple things like compares, boolean states,
etc took to much work (ie. get/set for a simple if (not null) return true;).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Howard M. Lewis Ship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "OGNL Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Tapestry-developer] OGNL


> Thanks for sharing; I don't always get as much (positive) feedback as I'd
> like.
>
> OGNL significantly reduces the amount of Java code; what's left is usually
> just accessor methods and listener methods.  Things still seem fast enough
> (and buying more memory and faster processors is still a better bargain
than
> putting more burden on Java developers).
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Craig Miskell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:29 PM
> Subject: [Tapestry-developer] OGNL
>
>
> > Can I just say publicly that OGNL support in Tapestry 2.2 (b3)
absolutely
> > rocks.  Although from a cleanliness point of view it's not good to have
> > too much "code" in the bindings (.jwc/.page), it certainly makes life a
> > lot easier when you're just comparing two values for a conditional:
> >
> > <binding name="condition" expression="value1.equals(value2)" />
> >
> > expresses the condition so much clearer than
> >
> > <binding name="condition" expression="someConditionEvaluationProperty"
/>
> >
> > where you have to go check the property get method or other code to be
> > certain what the condition is.
> >
> > As for what else it can be made to do, the mind boggles.
> >
> > Thank you Howard, you've made all our lives a whole lot easier,
> >
> > Craig Miskell
> > Programmer, Black Albatross, Otago University, New Zealand
> > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> > Version: 3.1
> > GCS d- s+:- a-->? C++++(++)$ ULXH+++$>++++ P+>++++ L++$>++++$ E--- W+++$
> > N+ K? w--- !O M-- V? PS--- PE Y t++ 5 X+++ R-- tv+ b+>+++ DI++++ D+ G+
e++
> > h--- r+++ y+++
> > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tapestry-developer mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-developer
> >
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Tapestry-developer mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-developer



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Tapestry-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-developer

Reply via email to