Ok, not as many as I thought, although there may some still lurking. Either way, there's half a dozen(+) current WO developers checking Tapestry out for usefulness, and several others who have completely left WO behind and struck out into the brave new world.
In line with some of the other comments over the last week, I would like to add my $0.02 worth: If we want to "bulk up" the Tapestry user base, then WO programmers are the ones to go for. Typically they have done the hard yards of understanding a component based web app framework, and only need a slight push to get into the Tapestry way of thinking. They typically appreciate the inherent beauty and efficiency over alternatives (JSP etc), and will be at least *willing* to spend a bit of time getting their heads around alternatives (if maybe not always able to immediately). And with the periodic rumbles of discontent in the WO user community, I'm sure there are a number who wouldn't mind switching away if there was a viable alternative... we just have to let them know. Craig Miskell Programmer, Black Albatross, Otago University, New Zealand -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS d- s+:- a-->? C++++(++)$ ULXH+++$>++++ P+>++++ L++$>++++$ E--- W+++$ N+ K? w--- !O M-- V? PS--- PE Y t++ 5 X+++ R-- tv+ b+>+++ DI++++ D+ G+ e++ h--- r+++ y+++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Tapestry-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-developer
