[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 31/10/2002 06:55:59 PM: > This may be a little premature, but may I suggest that this might be the > point to split the mailing list in two... one for "users", and one for > "developers". Issues coming up for vote could be advertised in the > "users" mailing list, but I wouldn't want to see the user mailing list > cluttered with +1/-1 replies whenever a voting issue comes up. That > should be reserved for the devel list. Those who just want to use > Tapestry can ignore "devel" and just watch "users". > > Any thoughts? +1 - that's how things usually get split up @ apache.
You'll see struts-dev and struts-user, ant-dev and ant-user, turbine-maven-dev and turbine-maven-user. As long as the -dev discussion are carried out in full public view and anyone can participate, that'd be great. Apache also has the notion of 'binding' and 'non-binding' votes, where committers can cast a 'binding' vote and other contributors can cast a 'non-binding' vote. This lets the contributors have their say, if they want to, and the power of the decision still rests with the committers. > Craig -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Work: http://www.multitask.com.au Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en _______________________________________________ Tapestry-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-developer
