> It works now. /-) ... > Is the above method of returning a bound value good?
If it works, it's good! It's actually very similar to our approach - we got tired of writing that code all over the place, so moved it into a superclass, but it is essentially the same. > Or should I define bound value property methods differently? If your content object is mutable, and the instance itself does not need to be changed by the editor (which appears to be the case), then I think you could use a direction="in" parameter, and not have to deal with the binding at all. In that case, your get/setContent() would just be the trivial "return this.content;" and "this.content = value;", letting Tapestry set the content for you to get. Richard ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html _______________________________________________ Tapestry-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-developer
