Re: [Tapestry-developer] Stale session

[Dave Roberts]

Thanks, Howard. Which page on the Wiki should I look at? I have seen the stuff on Anonymous Components, Tapestry Lite, etc. Is that what you are referring to, or something else? I couldn't find a page specifically on 2.4. There was a page on Future Tapestry Features, but it didn't seem to describe this issue much.   Thanks,   -- Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: Howard M. Lewis Ship To: Dave Roberts ; Dirk Olmes Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 9:08 PM Subject: Re: [Tapestry-developer] Stale session Please see the Wiki; this is yet another thing to be fixed in 2.4.  Tapestry can, and should, be doing things smarter.   Static bindings are primarily for strings, nowadays.  OGNL recognizes "true" and "false" literals, as well as property path expressions and such.  So, <static-binding> for string literals, <binding> for property paths and numeric literals, and <string-binding> for localized messages.