Title: RE: [Tapestry-developer] Reducing the time of the development cycle.

Hi -

This was a timely question.  Our UI designer was getting very frustrated trying to tweak the HTML associated with Tapestry components because of the long turn around times.  Based on the suggestions on the list, we developed a process where he could change the HTML and see results in a few seconds.

Here is the process for people using JBoss/Resin or JBoss/Jetty with Tapestry. 

1.  Change the JBoss startup script to pass '-Dnet.sf.tapestry.disable-caching=true'.  When you disable caching, you can change the HTML/page or jwc files after deployment.  Pages are rendered a little  more slowly but not too bad.

2.  Change war file so that all HTML, jwc, page files are packaged under the war's WEB-INF/classes directory.  When deployed, these Tapestry files can be modified without rebuilding, redeploying or restarting JBoss.

3.  Go ahead and change the deployed Tapestry files.  After the change, refresh the browser page to force Tapestry to re-load your definitions and HTML.  Here are directions for finding the deployed Tapestry files

for Resin and Jetty.

   -  If you are using Resin, the deployed Tapestry files are
      located under the jboss/server/default/tmp directory assuming
      you are using the 'default' server configuration.

   -  If you are using Jetty, the location is located in your Documents
      directory.  Watch the deployment and JBoss/Jetty tells you
      where the deployed files are located.  Here a sample of the output.

      10:38:50,231 INFO  [jbossweb] Registered
      jboss.web:Jetty=0,JBossWebApplicationContext=4,context=/asset
      10:38:50,451 INFO  [jbossweb] Extract jar:file:/D:/jboss-3.0.5RC1/
      server/default/tmp/deploy/server/default/deploy/
      admin.ear/27.admin.ear-contents/asset.war!/ to
      c:\DOCUME~2\Owner\LOCALS~1\Temp\Jetty_0_0_0_0_8080__asset\webapp
 
4.  Make sure to copy any deployed Tapestry files back to your source directories before redeploying/restarting JBoss.

Hope that helps...
Dorothy

-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Clayton
To: Simon Robins; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 1/3/03 1:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Tapestry-developer] Reducing the time of the development cycle.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I could see the use as an Ant task. Typically, my current build
environment
uses Ant and JBoss. Although hot redeployment works in JBoss, it is very
slow
when used in development mode with Tapestry (problem with the way it's
unified classloader does things) - so this task would speed things up
for me
in the case where I make a simple mistake.

It would be good!

On Thursday 02 Jan 2003 8:30 pm, Simon Robins wrote:
> Happy New Year All!
>
> Now that I feel comfortable with Tapestry, one of the areas of
> improvement for me would be to reduce the development cycle - code,
> compile, deploy, test, code...
>
> One of the problem areas is also one of the most powerful - namely the
> dynamic nature of Tapestry. For example, forgetting to add an accessor
> which is referenced in a .page or .jwc document isn't spotted until
the
> test cycle, also forgetting to add a component to the same documents
> isn't spotted until the .html page is referenced. Also an invalid xml
> document is also a problem area. Obviously a validating XML editor
> would solve this one - but I tend to hand write xml documents as I
> haven't come across an XML editor that integrates well with my
> development environment.
>
> To this end I'm thinking of writing an Ant task altough initially it
> will probably just be an application. Firstly it would check the
> validity of the relevant XML document, then it would do it's best to
> check that the relevant accessors were available in the matching .java
> file. It would also check that any jwcid attributes within the HTML
> file had matching components. Lastly it could check that any
> string-binding's had matching entries in the properties file including
> the <span key=""/> HTML tag. Plus anything else that comes to mind.
>
> I'm interested to hear any suggestions - would anyone else find it
> useful, have I missed anything, etc.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Simon
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Tapestry-developer mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-developer

- --
Regards,
Neil Clayton

(PS: If you see strange text you don't understand underneath my email,
don't
worry - it's just my PGP signature)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+FVQILXcfQF3yrNoRAnt0AKC0fsNJsAGAmdZ2Vk8lk+4qS2bAuACgsWic
cQLfDQjQlO/WBHSWh9ics7I=
=QKgv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Tapestry-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-developer

Reply via email to