On Friday 22 April 2005 16:43, Justin Morgan wrote:
> Erik Hatcher writes:
> >> Hungarian notation does have its uses.
> > Bah! Not in Java it doesn't.
>
> I write:
> Agreed. One of the great things about Java is that it eliminates the
> need for Hungarian notation.
>
> Even in plain old Java, though, we still have Hungarian notation. "Get
> and set" anyone? How often do you write code like this:
>
> String getFoo() {
> return foo;
> }
>
> Does it ever annoy you? Now, you're going to say "yes but that makes it
> easier in the future if you make it multithreaded or add validation." I
> argue the language could have handled this more gracefully. Take a look
> at C#'s object properties for a marginal improvement over this pattern.
>
> Sorry to get off-topic.
Sorry but:
private string topic;
public string Foo
{
get
{
return foo;
}
set
{
foo = value;
}
}
does not seem to be more comfortable. Ok you have no need for "get" or "set" in
the method-name
but else...
Cheers,
Markus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
