Karthik Abram wrote: > Checkout componentart.com's product lineup (checkout the demos for the > components) - ASP.NET is the real competition. > > I've said it before and I'll say it again - Tapestry 4.0's focus & direction > is, in my opinion wrong. People will use Tapestry if it provides components > of dizzying complexity and capability - not to mention look 'n feel. > Integrating HiveMind sounds like a bad idea - especially since Spring is by > far the more popular framework. Not invented here? Or, a packaging a la > Microsoft?
further decoupling layers, and making "plug and play" more and more possible is a bad idea??? As for the components... componentart.com isn't microsoft, even though microsoft provides asp.net... ie, it's up to users and other corporations to write, package, and distribute components. I created tassel to help with that... in the next few weeks, my schedule will be opening up... slightly... and I have some major improvements and revampings to tassel in mind (yes, yes, I will finally get around to making a more useable user interface. =) Anyway... the point is, like ASP.NET, tapestry provides the framework and inner-workings to create the components; it's up to you to create the dazzling components. Robert > > inflation adjusted 53 cents > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
