Erik, thank you for clarifying things for me.  I'm not lost to Wicket.
 I was just making a point. ;)

Thanks again.

Gregg

On 5/6/05, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> On May 6, 2005, at 11:23 AM, Gregg D Bolinger wrote:
> > I am hoping that IoC still remains a developers option when using
> > Tapestry.
> 
> Of course it is.  How could it not be?  You could use Spring in
> Tapestry 3.0 just fine, and there is nothing any Java project could
> do to prevent you from using Spring (is there?).
> 
> >   How hard will it be to use Spring instead of HiveMind if I
> > want?  Is that even possible?
> 
> You will use Spring just like you always do... and it will actually
> be even easier than ever before *because* of HiveMind facilitating it
> with custom prefix handling and other more flexible infrastructure.
> 
> > BTW - I've taken a look at Wicket and while it does look like a
> > Tapestry clone, it is coming along quite nicely.  If I am forced to
> > use HiveMind with the new Tapestry, I'll use Wicket. :)
> 
> Well, I guess we've lost you to Wicket then.  "forced" is such a
> strong word.  You were "forced" to use the built-in IoC-like stuff in
> Tapestry 3.0 and you didn't complain.  Tapestry 4.0 provides a much
> more pluggable infrastructure based on HiveMind.  HiveMind is
> integral to it, but you may not ever see it specifically except for
> the JAR file in WEB-INF/lib.  The same configuration that you're used
> to in 3.0 will work in 4.0, and it will allow even more flexibility.
> 
> You won't be "forced" to use HiveMind as an IoC container for
> anything other than Tapestry internals (again, you may not even see
> it explicitly).  You can use whatever you want for your business/DB
> integration, Spring included.
> 
>      Erik
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to