Hi in tapestry 3.0.3 if we have to declare or use abstract methods we have to declare them as properties in .page file. Without that we cannot directly declare or use abstract methods in java file. Is it different in tapestry 4.
Muralidhar Y Software Engineer, Adastrum technologies-Nikai groups, EmiratesGroup-I.T Division, Dubai, UAE. Mobile : 00971-50-2256149. http://www.adastrumtech.com http://www.mercator.aero (Keep Smiling. Be happy All The Time.) -----Original Message----- From: Tomáš Drencák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 September 2005 21:36 To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: jwc files and annotations Properties are just two (one) abstract methods e.g.: public abstract User getUser(); public abstract void setUser(User user); you can also use just getter without setter. If you want to make a persistent property tag getter with @Persist annotation. for beans create abstract getter with bean name and tag it with @Bean annotation @Bean public abstract ValidationDelegate getValidationDelegate() it is then accessible through ognl expression like ordinary bean (beans.validationDelegate) 2005/9/17, Muralidhar Y. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I am not sure. As far as I know tapestry recognises .page file. By > that only it looks for .html file and .java file. I have checked the source code too. > It is like that. At least when you want to declare properties you have to > use .page file. Mostly it cannot be completely empty. If you have to > declare properties how you are declaring them? In case of beans also you > have to use .page file. If you find any other way let me know too. > > > > > Muralidhar Y > Software Engineer, > Adastrum technologies-Nikai groups, > EmiratesGroup-I.T Division, > Dubai, UAE. > Mobile : 00971-50-2256149. > http://www.adastrumtech.com > http://www.mercator.aero > (Keep Smiling. Be happy All The Time.) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tomáš Drencák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 17 September 2005 12:03 > To: Tapestry users > Subject: Re: jwc files and annotations > > But why to have one almost empty file (only xml specification)? > > 2005/9/17, Muralidhar Y. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > You don't need to have them in different locations. Once there is > > .page file you can move them as you want and also you can keep them > > together in a directory or in a single jar file. > > > > > > > > > > Muralidhar Y > > Software Engineer, > > Adastrum technologies-Nikai groups, > > EmiratesGroup-I.T Division, > > Dubai, UAE. > > Mobile : 00971-50-2256149. > > http://www.adastrumtech.com > > http://www.mercator.aero > > (Keep Smiling. Be happy All The Time.) > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tomáš Drencák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 17 September 2005 10:08 > > To: Tapestry users > > Subject: Re: jwc files and annotations > > > > But it's odd to have files for one purpose in three different > > locations (.page, .html, .class)... > > > > 2005/9/17, Muralidhar Y. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > Hi as per my experience if you want to move the files from default > > > location you have to have a .page file. If you have .page file > > > you can move any place you like. > > > > > > > > > > > > Muralidhar Y > > > Software Engineer, > > > Adastrum technologies-Nikai groups, EmiratesGroup-I.T Division, > > > Dubai, UAE. > > > Mobile : 00971-50-2256149. > > > http://www.adastrumtech.com > > > http://www.mercator.aero > > > (Keep Smiling. Be happy All The Time.) > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Tomáš Drencák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: 16 September 2005 22:43 > > > To: Tapestry users > > > Subject: Re: jwc files and annotations > > > > > > Well, I have written page without .page file and seems strange to > > > me, that there must be a page (.html) in root directory, > > > localization file in WEB-INF > > > (.properties) and finally class in classes directory. I think that > > > this should be set up some way... Any ideas? > > > > > > 2005/9/16, Tomáš Drenčák <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Thanks a lot. > > > > > > > > Another question... You are using pageValidate to set up > > > > thisPerson property. I'm still little bit confused about page > initialization. > > > > What are pageBeginRender, pageValidate and prepareForRender for? > > > > Where to initialize e.g. thisPerson from passed personId parameter? > > > > I've used pageBeginRender, lazy initialization, but which method > > > > is specially designed for this purpose? > > > > > > > > tomas > > > > > > > > 2005/9/16, Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On Friday 16 September 2005 17:40, Sylvain COUTANT wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm fairly new to Tapestry, but I thought jwc files were to > > > > > > define components, not pages. > > > > > > > > > > > > For pages, I have no .page file. Tap 4 supports a package > > > > > > list > > > > > > (org.apache.tapestry.page-class-packages) to search for a > > > > > > java class having the same name as the page. > > > > > > > > > > > > For components, I didn't find how I could avoid the jwc file. > > > > > > It's required by the <component-type> element in application > > > > > > description > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > I'm fairly new to tapestry also, but I am creating my entire > > > > > application (so > > > > > far) without needing any page or component specifications. > > > > > The entire thing is done with html templates and java classes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Basically, my application is called famtree, and therefore in > > > > > > > > > > WEB-INF/famtree.application file I have the following > > > > > > > > > > <application name="famtree" > > > > > engine-class="org.apache.tapestry.engine.BaseEngine"> > > > > > <description>Family tree</description> > > > > > <meta key="org.apache.tapestry.page-class-packages" > > > > > > uk.org.chandlerfamily.tapestry.famtree > > > > > </meta> > > > > > <meta key="org.apache.tapestry.component-class-packages"> > > > > > uk.org.chandlerfamily.tapestry.components > > > > > </meta> > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > Which defines where it looks for both my pages and my components. > > > > > > > > > > Each component class then looks a bit like the following > > > > > example > > > > > > > > > > package uk.org.chandlerfamily.tapestry.components; > > > > > import org.apache.tapestry.annotations.*; > > > > > import org.apache.tapestry.BaseComponent; > > > > > > > > > > import java.util.List; > > > > > > > > > > import uk.org.chandlerfamily.sqlmap.famtree.PersonSummary; > > > > > > > > > > @ComponentClass > > > > > public abstract class Children extends BaseComponent { > > > > > > > > > > @Parameter > > > > > public abstract List<PersonSummary> getChildList(); > > > > > > > > > > public abstract void setThisChild(PersonSummary thisChild); > > > > > public abstract PersonSummary getThisChild(); > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > Where this defines a component called "Children" which will > > > > > take a parameter called "childList" and which has a @Foreach > > > > > loop in the html template which interate over the list and use > > > > > "ognl:thisChild.someproperty to get a property of the child. > > > > > > > > > > Page files look a bit like > > > > > > > > > > public abstract class Details extends BasePage implements > > > > > PageValidateListener { > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public abstract int getPersonId(); > > > > > public abstract void setPersonId(int personId); > > > > > > > > > > public abstract Person getThisPerson(); > > > > > public abstract void setThisPerson(Person thisPerson); > > > > > > > > > > public void pageValidate (PageEvent event) { ... code > > > > > to set up "thisPerson" data from a database with a paramter > "personId" > > > > > passed in via a listener in another page which returns with > > > > > this page in its return statement. > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Alan Chandler > > > > > http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > -- > > > > > -- > > > > > -- > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
