Never mind, Peter. If you plan to use Hivemind, I can give you some code to
get you started. Or just urge Jean-Francois to work harder on hivetranse 0.6
;-)
regards, 
Marcus

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pete [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 9:59 AM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: Hibernate session model
> 
> 
> Thanks, Marcus! Sounds a lot little my own personal experiences.
> "session-per-request" can really make you look older and more 
> frustrated  
> :-(
> 
> Gotta do some coding in order to make long-sessions run. 
> thanks for your  
> time :-)))))
> 
> Best Regards
> Peter
> 
> On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 09:47:23 +0200, Schulte Marcus 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
> wrote:
> 
> > No, we don't use Spring anymore. I was (probably quite 
> unjustified) a bit
> > fed up with Spring after our first Session per request 
> experiences. Now  
> > we
> > use Hivemind whose concept of a "service-model" I found 
> very appealing.
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Pete [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 8:41 AM
> >> To: Tapestry users
> >> Subject: Re: Hibernate session model
> >>
> >>
> >> You really convince me that session-per-request is history...
> >>
> >> are you also using spring for transactions / resource
> >> handling / hibernate
> >> templates?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 08:23:23 +0200, Schulte Marcus
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > We're using using long sessions in two productive apps now.
> >> It works
> >> > great
> >> > and, for us, simplifies development considerably. Our first
> >> app using
> >> > hibernate used Spring w/ session per request and it
> >> generated some really
> >> > nasty ad-hoc work-around-code.
> >> >
> >> > We've implemented the long-session Pattern as a Hivemind
> >> service-model
> >> > which
> >> > was really easy to do.
> >> >
> >> > hth,
> >> > Marcus
> >> >
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: Henri Dupre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 9:25 PM
> >> >> To: Tapestry users
> >> >> Subject: Hibernate session model
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Has anyone  implemented a different Hibernate session
> >> model than the
> >> >> per-request with Tapestry?
> >> >> We are currently using a per-request one (with the 
> Spring Hibernate
> >> >> filter) but I'm considering a per-websession model (store the
> >> >> Hibernate session in the Visit). We are running into 
> some complex
> >> >> LazyExceptions and I don't see any advantage of using a 
> per-session
> >> >> model.
> >> >> Any experiences?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >>
> >> >> Henri.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to