I would look at the dojotoolkit link Norbert sent you regardless of tacos, it has lots of functionality in it already. (The autocomplete from tacos uses script.aculo.us for autocomplete, not dojo)
jesse On 11/11/05, Pedro Abelleira Seco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks. It works great. I'm not sure it suits my case, though. > > El Ven, 11-11-2005 a las 12:08 -0100, Ron Piterman escribió: > > If browser compatibility of IE >= 6.0 is not an issue, you can use > > scriptaculous's autocomplete (which is the one used by tacos). > > > > > <ציטוט Pedro Abelleira Seco: > > > Our problem is that we have to go to production with 3.0.3, so tacos is > > > not an option > > > > > > But I'm going to take a look at dojotoolkit. Thank you very much > > > > > > El Ven, 11-11-2005 a las 11:26 +0100, Norbert Sándor escribió: > > > > > >>- http://archive.dojotoolkit.org/nightly/tests/widget/test_ComboBox.html > > >>- I think tacos's Autocompleter does something similar (although I haven't > > >>used it yet) > > >> > > >>BR, > > >>Norbi > > >> > > >>----- Original Message ----- > > >>From: "Pedro Abelleira Seco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>To: "Tapestry users" <[email protected]> > > >>Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 8:29 AM > > >>Subject: Editable combobox > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>Hi all! > > >>> > > >>>We are developing an intranet application for an institution and we have > > >>>developed some components. Most of them are not reutilizable outside our > > >>>application (because them are targeted to the app business logic or have > > >>>to wait to some refactoring to be separable from the rest.) So far we > > >>>have only contributed one component to Tassel. > > >>> > > >>>Now we would like to have new component. We can develop it, but perhaps > > >>>they already exist or there is some javascript code to start with. > > >>> > > >>>The component would be a writeable combo. Our users like typing codes > > >>>(because most of the time they know them) but it's good to have a combo > > >>>to choose among the possible values for ocasional users. The problem > > >>>with HTML is that it lacks the possibility of typing into the combo (yes > > >>>browsers position the value and that, but it's not really usable). > > >>> > > >>>We would like to have a text entry with a button with a down arrow. You > > >>>could type text inside (autcompletion would be a bonus, of course, but > > >>>not required) and, if you don't remember the value be able to press the > > >>>button and get a list of values (ideally in two columns: code, > > >>>description). An editable combobox, that is. > > >>> > > >>>Has anybody done something similar? Does anybody think this would be a > > >>>bad solution? I suppose that those of you who are doing web based > > >>>business apps have this kind of problem. Usability of webapps sucks, but > > >>>with things like this we could improve a bit the situation. > > >>> > > >>>If we find something to begin with we could meet our deadline. We would > > >>>contribute back this component, of course. > > >>> > > >>>Thanks in advance. > > >>> > > >>>Pedro Abelleira Seco > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
