Isn't it open source? I've looked into the source code. Some things are done very cleanly (ie. the antler syntax, he handler classes), whereas some are done in a very clumsy non-OO manner (ie. the actual reflection uses static method calls and crosses several class boundaries back and forth). It wouldn't be inconceivable for someone to fork the source code off and actively develop and improve it.
I quite like OGNL, because as expression languages go, its got quite a lot of powerful syntax features that you don't find in the competition, like JSP expression language. -Scott On Sun 13 November 2005 03:15, Geoff Longman wrote: > I dunno. Lets go to the source... > > Well Drew? > > Geoff > > On 11/12/05, Ted Steen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is OGNL 3.0 ever going to be finished, or has development stoped? > > There where some serious speed improvements promised for 3.0, as far > > as I remember. > > > > -- > > /ted > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > The Spindle guy. http://spindle.sf.net > Get help with Spindle: > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/spindle-user > Announcement Feed: > http://www.jroller.com/rss/glongman?catname=/Announcements > Feature Updates: http://spindle.sf.net/updates > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
