On 11/15/05, Ron Piterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You are right, component annotations are clumsy. But, currently there > are 3 ways to define a component in a page - you might find .jwc or > .html way more apealing, and still use annotations for injecting or > setting defaults - that way you still can use what you like > (annotations) *and* convenient component defs.
Ron, could you go into a little more detail about what you're describing here? What is the ".jwc" way? Is that the same things as the xxx.page XML file way? I assume the HTML way is by using implicit components. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
