But the issue of YAWF. If you have a problem, a budget and a team, there are so many ways in, so many levels from which you might start the journey. I think it is inevitable because we all have the down to the metal languages, or else we wouldn't be able to do anything, and building a framework, although maybe years of work and complicated, is still too low level and not really big enough in itself for the whole thing to get wrapped up in just one or two solutions. Still it leaves you wondering, how long might this situation go on for. Eventually it should migrate down into a chip, a problem I commend to graphics board makers. But it could be a dangerous moment as then a lot of choices may be severely curtailed. Adam
On 08/12/05, Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Patrick Casey wrote: > > Yah, because no product *we* know and love would ever stoop to > > something as cheesy as version number inflation. <cough> Java 5.0<cough> > > :). > > > > --- Pat > *looks the other way around* > > -- > Ing. Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi > DTQ Software > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
