Since you have some experience with older/legacy databases, how would
Ruby/RoR stack up against Java/Tapestry in regard to legacy databases
and multiple databases?  Ruby and RoR in particular is appealing, but my
applications must reliably support DB2/400 in addition to MySQL (and
sometimes others).  The RoR wiki on DB2 (not to mention the additional
idiosynchrosies of DB2/400) basically says it doesn't work.  Many of my
internal applications would otherwise be well-suited to RoR, but I can't
live without fast and reliable DB2 database support with legacy/broken
schemas (composite keys, sometimes no primary key, etc.) and reliable
connection pooling.  Java/Tapestry/Hibernate always works, but I would
love to throw RoR into the mix.

Shawn

Quoting Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> 
> On Dec 12, 2005, at 9:08 AM, Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi wrote:
> >> Compilation isn't the key though.  Testing (not just unit testing)
>  
> >> is.
> > As I like to re-test my 300+ pages applications for a syntax error 
> 
> > after a refactoring. I can use my time better, you know.
> 
> Ever hear of "continuous integration"?!  ;)   Commit your changes,  
> let the server run the tests while you reply to e-mails.
> 
> > Of course, there are a lot of Javascript examples too, and that  
> > doesn't mean Javascript is maintainable or reliable
> 
> There you go blaming the language again.  Remember, it's the  
> programmers that create bugs, not the language.  Language matters, a 
> 
> lot, don't get me wrong.  One of the most fun jobs I've ever had was 
> 
> me coding in COBOL, I kid you not.... and lots of VMS DCL scripting 
> 
> which was loads of fun.  The system was architected extremely well, 
> 
> including the development processes of revision control (it's built 
> 
> into the VMS file system.  We had scripts around it to manage our  
> desired process of a REAL and TEST environment), issue tracking,  
> releases (making a tape to send to clients), billing, etc.  I've  
> never experienced and environment where things ran as smoothly as it 
> 
> did there... in COBOL and DCL.
> 
>       Erik
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to