+1 on moving to 1.5 for me, anything that makes my life easier :) I think if the backwards compatibility provided by retroweaver can be reasonably worked in then we're all happy right?
It's a tough decision. I don't have time to evaluate retroweaver tonight, but as long as it doesn't impose any large design impediments I don't see the problem. Everyone is moving to 1.5. We still have plenty of fun bug fixes and backward enhancements that can reasonably be made to 4.0 as well. jesse On 12/20/05, Richard Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Using Java annotations for Tapestry 4 development is dramatically > cleaner than doing it with page files. I (and my clients, including > the Fortune 100 one you know) would be fine with moving to JDK 5. > > Besides, we're talking next summer/fall for 4.1, plus time to make > sure it's settled in (and with no insistence that people leave T3 or > T4 for 4.1). Oracle, etc. would surely have their acts together by then. > > ...Richard > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
