In our company new projects are JDK 1.5. Some we're even migrating from 1.4to
1.5. I do not see any problem at all having 1.5 as a pre requisite for
Tapestry 4.1

On 12/21/05, Ivano Pagano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1 to switch for me.
> My company started this year with a java development department on 1.4,
> but we're almost completely switched to java 5 by now.
>
> I also think that the "Tap4.0 - java1.4", "Tap4.1 - java 5"
> compatibility choice would be nice and consistent.
>
> Ivano.
>
> Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
>
> >With Tapestry 4.0 winding down, some of us are already looking forward
> >to Tapestry 4.1.
> >
> >Now, we would hope that 4.1 will not have as long a life cycle as 4.0,
> >which was 50% too long.  I would hope for a final 4.1 by Q3 2006.
> >
> >One thing that I, personally, would like would be to start re-working
> >the APIs to make use of JDK 1.5 annotations and generics.  Unlike the
> >add-one annotation support in Tapestry 4.0, this would MANDATE JDK 1.5
> >for development and production.
> >
> >This is obviously a contentious issue, so I'm asking people to look
> >into their personal crystal ball and see what they and they're
> >organization will look like by next summer, in terms of JDK adoption.
> >
> >--
> >Howard M. Lewis Ship
> >Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
> >Creator, Jakarta Tapestry
> >Creator, Jakarta HiveMind
> >
> >Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
> >and project work.  http://howardlewisship.com
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Ivano Pagano
> **Analista Sviluppatore Sistemi Informativi
> MC-link S.p.A.
> *
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Via Carlo Perrier 9/a
> 00157 ROMA
> Telefono (+39) 06 41892424
> Fax (+39) 06 41892474
> Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> /In software development, "perfect" is a verb, not an adjective. There
> is no perfect process. There is no perfect design. There are no perfect
> stories. You can, however, perfect your process, your design, and your
> stories./
> *Kent Beck*
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Questa e-mail e gli eventuali file allegati sono da ritenersi
> confidenziali e rivolti alle sole persone in indirizzo; vi richiediamo
> pertanto di non diffonderlo ad altri se cio non è espressamente indicato.
> Se il messaggio vi è stato recapitato per errore vi preghiamo di
> distruggerlo e di volerci cortesemente avvisare.
> Grazie per la collaborazione.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to