Howard may be on to something.  In my WEB-INF folder i have /lib/tapestry-4 jars
but I also have a WEB-INF/old/tapestry 4 beta 11 jars.  I thought the
only jars that get put in the classpath must be in WEB-INF/lib/. 
Could it by its picking up the WEB-INF/old/* jars also??

On 1/31/06, Jeff Lubetkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's possible that tacos has this problem, but that was not the issue in
> our case, as we've custom rolled our AJAX stuff, and don't use tacos.
> The issue was in the standard Tapestry component pipeline.
>
> Later this afternoon I should have time to redo my debugging. I'll
> annotate the JIRA issue with what I find.
>
> jeff
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 12:04 PM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: BindingException Issues more prominent with annotations
>
> Ouch, I hope this has nothing to do with the tacos component enhancement
> pipeline contributions. It could very well be my fault somehow as well.
> I'll
> double check the tacos contribution rules to see if it looks like it
> might
> conflict with something in annotations.
>
> it's this btw (for howard) :
> <contribution configuration-id="tapestry.enhance.EnhancementWorkers">
>        Adds ajax render interception into component enhancement chain.
>        <command id="inject-ajaxrender"
>            object="service:tacos.enhance.ComponentRenderInterceptor"
>            before="tapestry.enhance.page-detach-listener" />
>        <command id="inject-formevent-listener"
>                object="service:tacos.enhance.FormComponentEventWorker"
>                after="inject-ajaxrender" />
>    </contribution>
>
> j
>
> On 1/31/06, Jeff Lubetkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > This looks very similar to a problem we encountered with
> > disable-caching=true and running parallel queries (such as when a
> > resulting HTML page contained multiple embedded asset requests, or
> AJAX
> > type requests).
> >
> > Basically, if two queries run in parallel and disable-caching is true,
> > then when the first one completes all caches will be cleared.  If the
> > second query is still running and dependent on caches, it will blow
> up.
> > I found some spots in the Component enhancement pipeline that, if they
> > found something cached at the beginning of the request, would throw
> like
> > this later after the cache had been cleared.
> >
> > Our problem was Annotation related, but it was a @Parameter annotation
> > that was blowing up for us.  I actually tracked down the specific
> cache
> > that was causing the problem, but that was a few months ago and I
> can't
> > remember the specifics.  We've stopped using the disable-cache mode,
> so
> > I haven't seen this in a while, but if I find some time later I can
> redo
> > the investigation...shouldn't take more than 30 minutes.
> >
> > jeff
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris Chiappone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 11:26 AM
> > To: Tapestry users
> > Subject: Re: BindingException Issues more prominent with annotations
> >
> > I'm still trying to figure this out.  Could this problem be associated
> > when disable-caching=true?
> >
> > On 1/29/06, Chris Chiappone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > New JIRA created:
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-848
> > >
> > > On 1/29/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I don't have a test for this case, so it would certainly be a bug.
> > > > Based on how the code is organized, I can't see how this could
> > happen
> > > > (confusion between the page and component annotations).  Each
> > > > "enhancement" of a class (page or component) gets its own instance
> > of
> > > > EnhancementOperationImpl, which is where these checks originate.
> > > >
> > > > ComponentConstructorFactoryImpl.getComponentConstructor() is
> > > > synchronized, I believe. I just can't see how page and component
> > class
> > > > enhancement could interfere with each other, but that's the nature
> > of
> > > > bugs.
> > > >
> > > > Have you created a JIRA issue (or re-opened the old one)?
> > > >
> > > > On 1/28/06, Chris Chiappone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > I'm still curious if someone can confirm this.  Is it true that
> > you
> > > > > cannot use the same named property in a page and a component?
> > That
> > > > > doing this could cause the binding exceptions that I have been
> > > > > getting??
> > > > >
> > > > > On 1/27/06, Chris Chiappone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > It looks like I can reproduce this issue easily.  For instance
> > say I
> > > > > > have a page that contains:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > @InjectState("visit")
> > > > > > public abstract Visit getVisitObj();
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And have the exact same getter (annotation or not) in my
> > component:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > public abstract Visit getVisitObj();
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The binding exception seems to occur.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Does this seem like correct behavior for tapestry?  I do this
> > quite
> > > > > > often in my components because at times the page may not have
> > the
> > > > > > visit or some other object that the page has, but other times
> it
> > may.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thoughts and help greatly appreciated
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 1/27/06, Chris Chiappone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > At first I thought I could work around these issues but they
> > seem to
> > > > > > > be popping up more and more throughout my application.  Its
> > really
> > > > > > > becoming an issue for me.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ever since I have moved from .page and .jwc files to
> > annotations I get
> > > > > > > these exceptions more often.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I don't believe I am doing anything wrong with these
> > annotations.  As
> > > > > > > you can see by the following one I have just declared a
> > DelegateBean
> > > > > > > in my class.  Using
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > @Bean(SimpleValidationDeleage)
> > > > > > > public abstract SimpleValidationDelegate getDelegate();
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That same Delegate is used on mulitple pages and in
> > components.  From
> > > > > > > what I understand this should be acceptable.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This issue also has sprung up on my declaring the same
> > Persistent
> > > > > > > property on different pages or components using the @Persist
> > > > > > > annotation.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I didn't run into these problems before I used annotations.
> > I'd also
> > > > > > > hate to have to go back to .page and .jwc files since there
> > are so
> > > > > > > many files that I've changed.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Here is an one of the exceptions:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Exception invoking listener method searchLinkListener of
> > component
> > > > > > > SearchResults/border.search: Error: An error occured
> > processing
> > > > > > > annotation @org.apache.tapestry.annotations.Bean(value=class
> > > > > > > view.util.SimpleValidationDelegate, lifecycle=REQUEST,
> > initializer=)
> > > > > > > of public abstract view.util.SimpleValidationDelegate
> > > > > > > view.components.BasicSearch.getDelegate(): Bean delegate has
> > already
> > > > > > > been declared (at Annotation
> > > > > > > @org.apache.tapestry.annotations.Bean(value=class
> > > > > > > view.util.SimpleValidationDelegate, lifecycle=REQUEST,
> > initializer=)
> > > > > > > of public abstract view.util.SimpleValidationDelegate
> > > > > > > view.components.BasicSearch.getDelegate()).
> > > > > > > binding:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > parameter listener, component=SearchResults/border.search,
> > > > > > > methodName=searchLinkListener,
> > > > > > > location=context:/WEB-INF/BasicSearch.html, line 16]
> > > > > > > component:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]/border.search]
> > > > > > > location: context:/WEB-INF/BasicSearch.html, line 16
> > > > > > > 11 <br>
> > > > > > > 12 <input jwcid="companyField"
> > > > > > > 13 autocomplete="off" size="20" id="txt1" /> <br>
> > > > > > > 14 <input jwcid="@Submit" name="Submit"
> label="message:submit"
> > /></form>
> > > > > > > 15
> > > > > > > 16 <a jwcid="@DirectLink"
> > listener="listener:searchLinkListener">
> > > > > > > 17 &raquo;&nbsp;<span key="advanced">Advanced</span>
> > > > > > > 18 </a>
> > > > > > > 19 </div>
> > > > > > > 20 </td>
> > > > > > > 21 </tr>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > org.apache.hivemind.ApplicationRuntimeException
> > > > > > > Error: An error occured processing annotation
> > > > > > > @org.apache.tapestry.annotations.Bean(value=class
> > > > > > > util.SimpleValidationDelegate, lifecycle=REQUEST,
> > initializer=) of
> > > > > > > public abstract view.util.SimpleValidationDelegate
> > > > > > > view.components.BasicSearch.getDelegate(): Bean delegate has
> > already
> > > > > > > been declared (at Annotation
> > > > > > > @org.apache.tapestry.annotations.Bean(value=class
> > > > > > > view.util.SimpleValidationDelegate, lifecycle=REQUEST,
> > initializer=)
> > > > > > > of public abstract view.util.SimpleValidationDelegate
> > > > > > > view.components.BasicSearch.getDelegate()).
> > > > > > > location: Annotation
> > @org.apache.tapestry.annotations.Bean(value=class
> > > > > > > view.util.SimpleValidationDelegate, lifecycle=REQUEST,
> > initializer=)
> > > > > > > of public abstract view.util.SimpleValidationDelegate
> > > > > > > view.components.BasicSearch.getDelegate()
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > org.apache.hivemind.ApplicationRuntimeException
> > > > > > > Bean delegate has already been declared (at Annotation
> > > > > > > @org.apache.tapestry.annotations.Bean(value=class
> > > > > > > view.util.SimpleValidationDelegate, lifecycle=REQUEST,
> > initializer=)
> > > > > > > of public abstract view.util.SimpleValidationDelegate
> > > > > > > view.components.BasicSearch.getDelegate()).
> > > > > > > location: Annotation
> > @org.apache.tapestry.annotations.Bean(value=class
> > > > > > > view.util.SimpleValidationDelegate, lifecycle=REQUEST,
> > initializer=)
> > > > > > > of public abstract view.util.SimpleValidationDelegate
> > > > > > > view.components.BasicSearch.getDelegate()
> > > > > > > Stack Trace:
> > > > > > >
> >
> org.apache.tapestry.spec.ComponentSpecification.addBeanSpecification(Com
> > ponentSpecification.java:410)
> > > > > > >
> >
> org.apache.tapestry.annotations.BeanAnnotationWorker.performEnhancement(
> > BeanAnnotationWorker.java:64)
> > > > > > >
> >
> org.apache.tapestry.annotations.AnnotationEnhancementWorker.performMetho
> > dEnhancement(AnnotationEnhancementWorker.java:142)
> > > > > > >
> >
> org.apache.tapestry.annotations.AnnotationEnhancementWorker.performMetho
> > dEnhancement(AnnotationEnhancementWorker.java:110)
> > > > > > >
> >
> org.apache.tapestry.annotations.AnnotationEnhancementWorker.performEnhan
> > cement(AnnotationEnhancementWorker.java:70)
> > > > > > >
> >
> $EnhancementWorker_1090cd8cc4b.performEnhancement($EnhancementWorker_109
> > 0cd8cc4b.java)
> > > > > > >
> >
> $EnhancementWorker_1090cd8cc4d.performEnhancement($EnhancementWorker_109
> > 0cd8cc4d.java)
> > > > > > >
> >
> $EnhancementWorker_1090cd8cc2d.performEnhancement($EnhancementWorker_109
> > 0cd8cc2d.java)
> > > > > > >
> >
> org.apache.tapestry.services.impl.ComponentConstructorFactoryImpl.getCom
> > ponentConstructor(ComponentConstructorFactoryImpl.java:97)
> > > > > > >
> >
> $ComponentConstructorFactory_1090cd8cc1a.getComponentConstructor($Compon
> > entConstructorFactory_1090cd8cc1a.java)
> > > > > > >
> >
> org.apache.tapestry.pageload.PageLoader.instantiateComponent(PageLoader.
> > java:531)
> > > > > > >
> >
> org.apache.tapestry.pageload.PageLoader.createImplicitComponent(PageLoad
> > er.java:481)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > ~chris
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > ~chris
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > ~chris
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Howard M. Lewis Ship
> > > > Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
> > > > Creator, Jakarta Tapestry
> > > > Creator, Jakarta HiveMind
> > > >
> > > > Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
> > > > and project work.  http://howardlewisship.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > ~chris
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ~chris
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


--
~chris

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to