I think prototype was designed by designers while dojo was designed by engineers.
On 4/5/06, Chris Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Lennart, > > From my own investigations, I'd describe the Prototype JS library as > primarily providing utility functions, which effects libraries such as > Scriptaculous and moo.fx utilise. Although you could do something like > re-write the XTile component to utilise the Prototype Ajax routines, I > think > the main consideration about whether to use Prototype will be whether you > want to use one of the effects libraries that requires it. > > I, currently, think the Scriptaculous effects library provides a slightly > more polished UI than the equivalent Dojo routines, but that's very much > my > subjective opinion. I'm sure that both libraries will improve over the > coming months, and I suspect that only time will tell which one becomes > more > accepted. > > Chris > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lennart Benoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, 6 April 2006 1:13 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Prototype JavaScript Framework > > > Hi All, > > Any experiences/ initiatives with tapestry and the prototype javascript > framework? > What Javascript framework are you guys using? Do we see standards > emerging? > > Kind regards, > Lennart > > > Lennart Benoot > www.thoth-systems.com > Knowing, Keep knowing > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://opennotion.com
