Ah, ok.. that explains it. I'll go for the @Hidden instead, that was what I wanted anyway.
On 4/19/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We've discussed this before > (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-tapestry-user/200602.mbox/ > [EMAIL PROTECTED]). I was burned > by the same thing. The "client" persistence strategy doesn't use the > squeezers to write out the data. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ted Steen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 7:03 PM > To: Tapestry users > Subject: wrong squeezer used when trying to @Persist("client") > > Hi! > > I've made a HibernateSqueezer that works fine, apart from one thing.. > When I try to @Persist("client") a property that should be squeezed > with the HibernateSqueezer tapestry falls back on the standard > DataSqueezer (wanting a Serializable object). > Now, is this a bug or am I doing something wrong? > Note that the squeezer works fine on this objects when e.g. passing a > parameter to a listener etc. > > Thanks! > /ted > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- /ted --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
