> On 17 Mar 2015, at 11:09, Michael Welzl <mich...@ifi.uio.no> wrote: > > Hi, > > >> On 16 Mar 2015, at 23:54, Karen Elisabeth Egede Nielsen >> <karen.niel...@tieto.com> wrote: >> >> HI, >> >> Please accept the following "minor" comments/questions to the TCP protocol >> components: >> >> #1: >> The list include both of the followings: >> >> *ordered delivery for each byte stream >> * stream-oriented delivery in a single stream >> >> Wouldn't it be more fair to combine these two and say: >> >> *ordered delivery in a single stream >> >> "Each stream" seems a little too much for TCP, I think. >> >> #2: >> Segmentation and bundling is listed as separate components, even if >> bundling, for TCP, is part of the segmentation process. >> I suppose that is as it should be, but when speaking "Bundling" then I >> actually think that "Bundling delay" is a better term. Especially for TCP. >> >> To put in context: >> For SCTP it is actually relevant to discuss bundling and bundling delay >> separately as two different components. >> Meaning that SCTP WILL bundle PDUs up to PMTU size (and I would call that >> bundling), but it CAN (depending on no_delay setting) implement bundling >> delay or not. > > So how does bundling without delaying work? cwnd doesn't allow you to send, a_rwnd doesn't allow you to send, you have a send() call which allows to provide multiple user messages, ...
Best regards Michael > > Cheers, > Michael > > _______________________________________________ > Taps mailing list > Taps@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps > _______________________________________________ Taps mailing list Taps@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
