Hi everyone,

With one week having passed since this posting, and one week to go until the 
meeting, I thought I'd send a reminder - folks, please consider taking a look 
at this.
For a fast way of reading this:

- keep in mind that we removed all transport features that either don't require 
application-specific knowledge (knowledge that only applications have) or don't 
have a fall-back to TCP
- start reading from section 4 !   This gives you about 13 pages to read 
instead of the total 35'ish, and it contains all the ineresting stuff. The 
pretty long section 3 can be used to go back and check, for things that make 
you go "huh??".

Thanks!
Michael


> On 13 Mar 2017, at 17:06, Michael Welzl <mich...@ifi.uio.no> wrote:
> 
> Dear TAPS WG,
> 
> This update addresses the feedback that we got at the last meeting: people 
> said that this minset isn't much of a minset. ... that's because we had only 
> worked on the first step: categorizing transport features such that the list 
> can then be reduced.
> 
> Now, in this update:
> - we've brought the list in line with the latest version of the -usage draft 
> (the list is a lot longer now, and includes what we think are *all* transport 
> features of TCP, MPTCP, SCTP, UDP(-Lite) ... except for TCP Authentication. 
> We'll fix this one in the next version.
> - we then shortened the list brutally  :)   by only allowing "functional" and 
> "optimizing" transport features, and also removing transport features for 
> which it doesn't seem possible to fall back to TCP
> - we then wrote text discussing the strange list that we got ... some weird 
> things there need consideration when designing a TAPS system
> - and then we made a first stab at constructing a "minimum set", derived from 
> the above.
> 
> I hope folks will find this interesting despite its length - it captures 
> several things that I've had in mind for a while, and partially talked about 
> to people, but never really wrote up anywhere. A lot of love has gone into 
> this document  ;-)
> 
> Cheers,
> Michael
> 
> 
> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>> From: <internet-dra...@ietf.org>
>> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-gjessing-taps-minset-04.txt
>> Date: 13 Mar 2017 16:55:05 CET
>> To: Michael Welzl <mich...@ifi.uio.no>, Stein Gjessing <ste...@ifi.uio.no>
>> Resent-From: <mich...@ifi.uio.no>
>> 
>> 
>> A new version of I-D, draft-gjessing-taps-minset-04.txt
>> has been successfully submitted by Michael Welzl and posted to the
>> IETF repository.
>> 
>> Name:                draft-gjessing-taps-minset
>> Revision:    04
>> Title:               A Minimal Set of Transport Services for TAPS Systems
>> Document date:       2017-03-13
>> Group:               Individual Submission
>> Pages:               38
>> URL:            
>> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gjessing-taps-minset-04.txt
>> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gjessing-taps-minset/
>> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gjessing-taps-minset-04
>> Diff:           
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-gjessing-taps-minset-04
>> 
>> Abstract:
>>  This draft recommends a minimal set of IETF Transport Services
>>  offered by end systems supporting TAPS, and gives guidance on
>>  choosing among the available mechanisms and protocols.  It is based
>>  on the set of transport features given in the TAPS document
>>  draft-ietf-taps-transports-usage-03.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>> 
>> The IETF Secretariat
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Taps mailing list
> Taps@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
Taps@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Reply via email to