Sure. Do you want to lead the discussion or should Phil? On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 3:12 AM Gorry Fairhurst <go...@erg.abdn.ac.uk> wrote:
> Could we please add some time to discuss the parameters and defaults - > Phil has been trying to get these into shape for some time and the text > in the iD has evolved to a place where decisions now need to be made, > and I'd really rather this was not pushed to the end of the agenda as > "other issues". > > In API, this relates to (this may also finally touch implementation): > > Default for Use 0-RTT session establishment #314 > Default for Control checksum coverage #315 > The recommended default and can we specify rather than recommend? #317 > Section 7 default #319 > > Gorry > > On 07/05/2019, 19:52, Aaron Falk wrote: > > > > Collating the input from the thread. Who will lead the discussion on > > the implementation draft? > > > > --aaron > > > > Agenda: > > > > 1. Framing - Tommy > > * See https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/323 > > 2. Implementation draft - ?? > > * See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-taps-impl/ > > 3. Yang Model - Jake > > * See > > > https://github.com/GrumpyOldTroll/python-asyncio-taps/blob/master/PyTAPS/modules/ietf-taps-api.yang > > 4. ARCH & API issue scrub & assign - Brian > > * See https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/issues > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Taps mailing list > > Taps@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps > > -- -- aaron Sent from Gmail Mobile
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list Taps@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
