If we don’t have key contributor available on Friday, we should probably move the meeting but otherwise I think we should still have it. It was announced in the last meeting or we can declare that as a design team meeting or something, but we should not delay progress because of a potential formality.
Still, I recommend to follow the guidelines in the IESG statement for future meetings of course :-) From: Taps <[email protected]> on behalf of Aaron Falk <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, 12. January 2021 at 16:39 To: taps WG <[email protected]> Subject: [Taps] Doodle for next interim It appears I’ve bolluxed up the meeting scheduling for this Friday by not getting the notice out in conformance with the approved process. Therefore, I need to ask you to submit your availability in the Doodle below. https://doodle.com/poll/y68hptgavkzxikxn?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link Sticking with the usual time and day. --aaron
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
