I’m concluding there are no objections to meeting IETF week.
--aaron
On 1 Jun 2021, at 18:23, Theresa Enghardt wrote:
Dear TAPS,
As we briefly discussed at the last interim meeting, we are
considering to ask for a 60 minute slot to do a TAPS WG meeting at
IETF 111 in July.
Topics could include:
- Status and potential input on Architecture, Interface, and
Implementation draft
- draft-taps-transport-discovery
- First proposals for mapping docs
- W3C Web & Networks Interest Group (We asked the W3C group's chair
whether they are interested in participating)
We would not do any detailed issue discussion and editorial work at
the IETF 111 session, as this is what our interim meetings focus on.
Are there any objections?
Please let us know ASAP. Otherwise, we'll put in a session request
early next week.
Our conflict list for IETF 106 was:
Chair conflict: maprg panrg httpbis
Technology Overlap: quic tls tsvarea tsvwg tcpm iccrg coinrg
Key Participant Conflict: irtfopen rmcat avtcore mops mboned
secdispatch mops tsvwg ippm
We're going to update this list. If you are aware of a conflict that
is not on that list, please let us know.
Best,
Theresa
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
