Top post replying ;-) and deleting the previous text. The TAPS I-Ds are all very *neat* and I intend to change my ballot to YES after a discussion with the relevant ADs this Thursday. Authors are obviously welcome as observers during the telechat.
I like Brian's distinction between prescriptive and descriptive architecture, but if this I-D is assumed to be descriptive (as most 'architecture' documents at the IETF), then why is there BCP 14 uppercase normative language ? This is my only blocking (for now) issue, I would welcome a 'requirement' in the title/abstract or removing the BCP14/PS in an architecture I-D. Regards and congratulations to all authors. -éric _______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
