On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 13:02, Bob Miller wrote: > Marty Lamb wrote: > > > Any other tokenizer ideas? > > Well, I want to see an automated, collaborative blacklist. From > tarproxy's point of view, this is basically like any other blacklist > tokenizer, except that it needs to know the final scoring of each host > (IP address).
Great idea. TarProxy could then use this information to determine the "initial" spamminess/throttle characteristics when a listed host connects for a more immediate effect on spammers. Of course, by sending "clean" content, they could redeem themselves over the course of the connection. I would imagine that each score would include a timestamp of when the session started or ended, or at least when TarProxy decided to assign it that score. Subscribers to this blacklist could then choose their own "forgiveness" period for each host. That's pretty cool. There are of course some tricky infrastructure issues involved with sharing that information, but nothing that hasn't been addressed by existing blacklists/DCC. - Marty -- Marty Lamb Martian Software <mlamb at martiansoftware dot com> ---- : The tarproxy-list mailing list is archived at : http://www.mail-archive.com/tarproxy-list%40martiansoftware.com/ : : To unsubscribe from this list, follow the instructions at : http://www.martiansoftware.com/contact.html : : TarProxy's project page can be found at : http://www.martiansoftware.com/tarproxy
