Stroucken, Michael wrote: > Since we're talking about the primitive scheduler here, I feel fine > filling from the user's reservation first without much more intelligence > to go into the decision.
Sounds good to me. 'Course, a user can always game the system by ensuring that the reserved capacity is consumed before creating additional VMs (by creating temporary dummy VMs, e.g.). I consider this a reasonable work-around though, not a bug. Mike
