Frank Niessink wrote: [...]
> Having another copy isnt a problem, but it isn't a solution either. > With Bazaar you can create a copy and that copy (called a branch) can > be committed to. So you'd get version control locally while still > being able to update from the central repository (called 'pull' in > Bazaar-speak) and commit to the central repository (called 'push'). > Hello Frank, thanks for your replies. A quick look around revealed git-svn (http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-svn.html http://git.or.cz/course/svn.html) and hgsubversion (http://code.google.com/p/hgsubversion/ http://blog.red-bean.com/sussman/?p=116 among others (http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/WorkingWithSubversion) as distributed version control systems "on top of" Subversion. Should it be decided to switch, perhaps a link to a cheat-sheet-for-subversion-users or so should be provided to keep the entrance barrier low. With best regards Clemens Anhuth
