Andrew Clegg wrote: > 2009/5/19 Andrew Clegg <[email protected]>: > >> Is this intentional? If so, it seems a bit strange -- multiple-service >> WSDLs are schema-valid, and compliant with the WS-I interop >> guidelines. And the URL of a WSDL file is surely an entirely arbitrary >> construct that doesn't really describe what's in it. The URI of each >> service in the WSDL would be a better discriminator, right? > > Sorry, I meant "the qualified name of each service in the WSDL" -- > i.e. namespace + servicename.
I agree. The namespace + servicename + operation would seem to be better. I will ask Stuart Owen (our WSDL expert) what he thinks. > Andrew. Alan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ taverna-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/taverna-users Documentation: http://www.mygrid.org.uk/usermanual1.7/ FAQ: http://www.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/Mygrid/TavernaFaq Biological Services: http://www.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/Mygrid/BiologicalWebServices
