You are saying if B is coordinated from A, B will run no matter A fails
or succeed in Taverna 2.0. I noticed that as well, but isn't this
feature confusing? or maybe you meant to implement it in this way for
other purpose?
Thanks.
From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 5:06:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Taverna-users] detecting the errors in a workflow
Also note that adding a coordination link is slightly different in
Taverna 2. As Taverna 1 processors with a failure don't complete, a
coordination to a failing processor would mean to not run if there was
a failure. Due to the pipelining model of Taverna 2 this behaviour is
slightly different, the iteration itself will complete, even if one or
more of those gave a failure. The coordination (or "Run after" as it's
called in 2.1 beta 2) is activated when the iteration has completed,
with or without failures.
__________________________________________________________________
Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!
http://www.flickr.com/gift/------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
taverna-users mailing list
[email protected]
[email protected]
Web site: http://www.taverna.org.uk
Mailing lists: http://www.taverna.org.uk/taverna-mailing-lists/
