Hi!

I have looked at your attached workflow (separate email), and although
I have not had time to debug it properly with 3.0.a2, my first thing
to check would be the workflow name - everything else seems proper.


You called the workflow
"http:..ns.taverna.org.uk.2010.workflowBundle.1b2dee3b-3556-4706-86fd-e417705f20c8.workflow.Workflow4.labeler.Workflow1"
- and SCUFL2 is escaping this correctly, I am not sure if every UI
element of the workflow can handle this.  Could you try with a
simpler&shorter workflow name like "workflow5" ?

If you see any beanshell input/output ports in the JSON should not
really be needed for execution (as they are defined straight on the
activity), but the UI for configuring beanshell might still have some
Taverna 2.x remnants that rely on these - the t2flow parser does not
keep these in the JSON.

Do you get anything interesting in the log files? See Advanced -> Show
data/logs folder and go into "logs".





On 8 January 2014 14:40, Pinar Alper <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> happy new year to all Taverna users and developers!
>
>
> I have a workflow maker programme that creates a workflow bundle using the
> latest version of the SCUFL2 API (0.13.1). It is obviously based on the
> workflow-maker example provided by the developers. But upgraded to latest
> scufl api version (with some guessing).
>
> I open the bundle up in T3 (v 3.0.a2). (Note opening up  is also
> non-deterministic, in some attempts the workbench just hangs I suspect it
> is due to workbench not launching properly.) Anyway, in cases when it
> successfully opens the bundle, I attempt to run it. It is a workflow
> comprised of String constant and  simple Beanshell processors and Data and
> Control-flow links. The execution pane is shown but nothing else happens.
> Taverna does not complain about anything either.
>
> When I manually create a workflow containing string constants, beanshells
> and data flow links using the T3 workbench's editor. T3 runs this wf fine.
>
> So I'm suspecting this is due to some missing configuration in my bundle.
> Could you give any hints on what might be wrong with the attached bundle?
> Btw when I use the scufl api to generate processor bindings I realised
> that the JSON config is not automatically generated for "inputPorts" and
> "outputPorts", therefore I had to add explicit JSON generation bits to my
> workflow maker.
>
> --
> regards
> pinar
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
> organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance
> affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your
> Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> taverna-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> [email protected]
> Web site: http://www.taverna.org.uk
> Mailing lists: http://www.taverna.org.uk/about/contact-us/



-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
http://soiland-reyes.com/stian/work/ http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
taverna-users mailing list
[email protected]
[email protected]
Web site: http://www.taverna.org.uk
Mailing lists: http://www.taverna.org.uk/about/contact-us/

Reply via email to