Hello Nick! On Sunday, March 17, 2002 at 2:58:30 PM you wrote:
> Ok, but I don't think you should add your own comment on whether it should > be fixed or not, because the Bug List is beginning to grow... and only one > of them is checked as "should be fixed". What kind of List is this then? A > list of acceptable bugs? ;o) If you followed it, you know that it's not intended to be YAL of bugs, but exactly as you describe it: Which bug is acceptable *at the moment*. We all know that it is virtually impossible to release software completely bug free. But I am deeply convinced as I've stated elsewhere that TB! needs an official release. If bugs stem from before v1.54 I can't see why we should wait another millennium until a release is made just to see it fixed. I want to see if there are still grave and serious bugs left that forbid a new release like the RTV memory leak did. Or if the known bugs now are of a minor class that should be fixed during "normal" development. As I wrote in another mail some days back: I think TB! is ready to be released as 1.54 or 1.6 or even 1.9 (but not 2.0). But that may only be because I am not aware of any serious or grave bugs. -- Dierk Haasis http://www.Write4U.de http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.54 Beta/49 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C Todo, pero con manera (Everything, but with civility.). -- _________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wish List : https://bt.ritlabs.com/ BugTraq : https://bt.ritlabs.com/
