On Tuesday, March 9, 2004, at 18:23:27 [UTC+0100] (Tuesday, March 9, 2004 18:23 my local time) Peter Palmreuther wrote:
>>> So? What the problem with that? That's exactly the same situation as >>> with www.mail-archive.com, where our messages are currently >>> archived. JA>> But mail-archive.com completely obliterates any string that has even a JA>> remote chance of being an address. > Except senders address. > Before you start crying "But after 'From:' there only is the name and > no address ...": have a look at an arbitrary message archived there. > Look into HTML sources. Look at the very bottom. [...] It is even worse, as you can see on the top of HTML source: <!--X-From-R13: [ngg Fubrar <xxxxNyyyyyy.zzz> --> Except of first character in sender name and substitution for "@" sign in e-mail the whole address is easy readable. So, mail-archive.com must not be considered as secure. -- Best regards, Zygmunt Wereszczynski (Using The Bat! v2.05 Beta/1 on Windows 20005.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4) ________________________________________________________ Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
