On Thursday, October 28, 2004 at 5:23:34 AM [GMT -0500], Allie_M wrote: > Just a test to see what wrapping is like on sending with this > editor. I see wrapping while typping, but we'll see how wrapping > goes after sending and I have to read it.
Wow!. Go figure. This test message was supposed to be sent to one of my own addresses. I vividly recall replacing the To: address with my own address. This is bizarre. Ah well. It could have been worse. I could have written some expletives or some other sort of socially unacceptable prose as my test material. ;) Anyway, from my test here, it would seem that all of the Windows Editors wrapping is soft or virtual. Though the quotes seem to be rewrapped in classic saw-toothed fashion, and your new text is wrapped as you type, it's just soft-wrapping for visual comfort. None of that wrapping is actually hard-coded in the message formatting for sending. So no wrapping takes place at all. It's the 'smart wrapping' feature that saves me when I generate replies to messages from many who use the Windows editor. Their text is unwrapped and without 'smart wrapping', each paragraph appears in MicroEd as a long single line of text. MicroEd shows you the exact text formatting. It doesn't fool you into thinking text is wrapped when it really isn't. -- -= Allie =- ..... Only those who do nothing make no mistakes. __________________________________________________ IMAP [ Client: The Bat!™ v3.0.2.2 Rush | Server: MDaemon Pro ] OS: Windows XP Pro (Service Pack 2) ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.0.2.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
