Hello Alexey, Wednesday, December 8, 2004, 2:02:25 AM, you wrote:
ASK>> Good for the filter, bad for the user who has to tend to that ASK>> translation table... > Not so bad, really. The table can be prepared by translator and > included into .lng translation. Then it will be attached to the > filter's settings automatically. I still can't see what sense it would make in the end... common "cyphers" (according to Alexander Leschinsky its the purpose to catch those) for "letters in numbers" include 1=I 2=Z 3=E 4=A 5=S 6=G 7=T 8=B ... what happens with normal numbers? And won't the filter actually be weakened by this? When I was using PopFile, I found it highly interesting that there was a large number of "unique" word entries in the spam dictionary (even though most of my mail is, thanks to the TB lists, english, as was the majority of spam I received) - thus, my understanding would be that treating different/cyphered words equally weakens the filter. If I understood the function correctly, with the translation table, "V14GR4" will be recognized as "viagra" - that means to me, its always taken from the one dictionary whereever "viagra" is in (if its in the ham or the spam dictionary depends on one's email *g*). Without such a translation, "viagra" could be in the ham dictionary, while "V14GR4" and other variants would be in the spam dictionary... you understand what I mean? -- Best regards, Alexander mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
