On Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 9:07:59 AM [GMT -0500], Avi Yashar wrote: > I see that Allie's filter is now doing a better job of trimming your > sig. So, finally, what do you think of my suggestion about forgoing > the PGP when sending messages to the list? If that is possible, then > your messages should easily fall within the range of exemplary > signature length.
:) I can't recall what happens if Stuart were to use PGP/MIME. Maybe the sysadmins have nothing in place for that. PGP/MIME was a godsend when it appeared. Marck and I would be frequently harassed about our PGP sigs lengthening our signatures and causing a lot of "viewing noise", especially since we encouraged short signatures. -- .. . . | IMAP Client: The Bat!™ v3.0.2.5 _.||* _ |\/| | IMAP Server: MDaemon Pro (_]|||(/,____| | | OS: Windows XP Pro (Service Pack 2) ..... The cigarette does the smoking, YOU'RE just the sucker!!
pgpmAxfxcLE5q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
